HTTP Anti-Virus Proxy

Official HAVP Support Forum
Registration disabled, I'm tired of spambots. E-mail havp@hege.li if you have questions.
HAVP project is pretty much frozen/abandoned at this time anyway.
It is currently 22 Jun 2014 09:52

All times are UTC + 2 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: VMware
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 16:59 
I have a windows 2003 box w/ many VM's one is IPCOP w/ Copfilter.
My question is does HAVP use a large amount of CPU processing power to scan webpages/downloads? I have noticed a significant lose in CPU from my stand alone machine to the VM enviroment.

I know I am sharing my CPU with other VM's but I was just wondering if HAVP normally used alot of CPU Power?

I am using IPCOP ver 1.4.10 w/ Copfilter ver .82 installed.
Currently Copfilter is using Ver .76 of HAVP.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 17:19 
Offline
HAVP Developer

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 18:12
Posts: 687
Location: Finland
Naturally virus scanning takes quite much CPU power. For normal surfing (small files, not archives) it isn't that bad though. I actually test HAVP inside VMware too. I don't notice any big slowdown, but I use it alone..

A wild guess could be 1GHz needed for every 50 requests/second.

Maybe raising VM priority more helps..

Cheers,
Henrik


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 19:00 
What ver of VMware are you using?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 20:08 
Offline
HAVP Developer

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 18:12
Posts: 687
Location: Finland
5.5 on WinXP / Athlon 2800+, using Debian works like greased lightning for me..

Cheers,
Henrik


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 21:13 
Thanks for the quick response!

I am using workstation 5.0
I have other server like

2003 AD
2003 Exchange
2003 Web Server x2
2003 database
IPCOP

My next questions was, how do you give priority to certain VM's.
I have searched high and low and havent found alot to tweak it.
I have just opened 'task manager' on the host and given that vm pid a 'above normal' priority?

Thanks for the input!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2006 22:17 
Offline
HAVP Developer

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 18:12
Posts: 687
Location: Finland
Could be that there are so many services in 2003 that are taking juice, hehe. Or that 5.5 is slighly faster on Linux.

You are right, there is not much options, I use the normal and high priority when selected options. You should put all other VM on low priority then.

Cheers,
Henrik


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 03 Mar 2006 02:41 
Well I left the rest of the VM's alone and and ran IPCOP just "aboveNormal" mode and it seems to run just great.

Again thanks for the fast responses ;)


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group